Contact Me By Email


What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.


This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.
Showing posts with label Civil and political rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil and political rights. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Louisiana Paper Revisits 1964 Civil Rights Killing - NYTimes.com

Three Ku Klux Klan members standing beside aut...Image via WikipediaLouisiana Paper Revisits 1964 Civil Rights Killing - NYTimes.com

By KIM SEVERSON
ATLANTA — Stanley Nelson writes for a small weekly newspaper in the Louisiana delta. For the past four years, he has been obsessed with one story: who threw gasoline into a rural shoe repair and dry goods shop in 1964 and started a fire that killed Frank Morris?

No one disputes that the death of Mr. Morris, a well-liked businessman who served both black and white customers, was connected to the Ku Klux Klan. The case is on a list of unsolved civil rights murders the F.B.I. released in February 2007, the day Mr. Nelson first heard of the story.

But for a lengthy article that appeared Wednesday in The Concordia Sentinel, Mr. Nelson, 55, put together what he believes is a key piece of the puzzle. He names the last living person he says was there that night.

In the article, both a son and a former brother-in-law of Arthur Leonard Spencer, 71, a truck driver from rural Rayville, La., say Mr. Spencer admitted to being involved in the fire. Mr. Spencer’s ex-wife, Mr. Nelson reported, said she had heard the same story from another man who was also there.

Mr. Spencer, by his own account, was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. But in interviews with Mr. Nelson, he denied knowing or having been one of two men suspected of burning the shop in Ferriday, La., near the Mississippi border, the hometown of the famous cousins Mickey Gilley, Jerry Lee Lewis and the Rev. Jimmy Lee Swaggart.

Mr. Spencer has not been charged, and the F.B.I. has not said whether it is investigating him. However, he told Mr. Nelson after the article appeared on Wednesday that the F.B.I. had interviewed him within the last two months.

Mr. Spencer could not be reached by The New York Times at his home or at Jimmy Sanders, a farm supply store where he works. His co-workers said he had gone to the hospital for blood tests.

Bettye Spencer, 67, who was married to Mr. Spencer at the time of the fire, said in an interview on Wednesday by phone from her home in Rayville that she had never heard anything about the case. The F.B.I. visited her a few months ago and she told them that she had been a young mother when Mr. Spencer left her for another woman. That woman and her son are both sources in the article linking Mr. Spencer to the fire.

Mrs. Spencer is still close to her former husband and said she talked to him early Wednesday. He was surprised that people were trying to connect him to the fire.

“I’m telling you he had nothing to do with this,” she said. “We’re just old country people and I don’t understand where this is coming from. This is 46 years ago and now people are digging up bones?”

Unlike many of the 110 civil rights murders being investigated by both the F.B.I. and journalists who operate under the umbrella group called the Civil Rights Cold Case Project, the story of Mr. Morris’s death stands out because it is one of a handful in which someone believed to be connected to the episode is still alive.

“The big concern about all of this is time,” Mr. Nelson said. “The time to solve these cases is maybe another year, or another two years maybe. People are dying.”

The F.B.I. investigated the killing of Mr. Morris, who was 51, twice in the 1960s, and took up the case again in 2007. Since the most recent investigation, The Sentinel and other organizations have criticized the speed with which the F.B.I. and the Justice Department have approached the old cases.

Cynthia Deitle, chief of the F.B.I.’s civil rights unit, told the newspaper that federal officials were actively working on the case and that she believed people were still alive who knew who killed Mr. Morris. She reiterated her agency’s dedication to what she called “one of the most horrific and troubling of all the F.B.I.’s civil rights era cold cases.”

The link to Mr. Spencer is based in part on the newspaper’s interviews with his son, William Spencer, known as Boo. William Spencer told Mr. Nelson that he was trying to turn his life around after getting out of prison and finding religion.

He said he heard his father speak of the fire more than once. The elder Spencer was one of at least two white men who headed there in the early morning hours, intending to burn the shop as a message to the black owner, whom Klan members believed was too friendly with white female customers. The men did not expect the shop owner to be inside, the son told The Sentinel.

“My dad said they could hear a stirring in the place, then a man came out,” William Spencer said. Mr. Morris apparently had come out of the store to find men splashing gasoline and was forced back inside. Burned so badly that nurses could not recognize him, Mr. Morris lived for four more days. He gave interviews to the F.B.I. but never identified his attackers.

“Son, it was bad,” the younger Mr. Spencer recalled his father saying. “I’ll never forget it.”

Arthur Spencer’s former brother-in-law, Bill Frasier, told the newspaper that he, too, had heard the story from Mr. Spencer.

The newspaper reported that both William Spencer and Mr. Frasier had told their stories to the F.B.I. The agency would not comment on the case, but a spokesman pointed out that prosecuting an arson case in federal court might pose challenges. The arson would have had to involve something that was a federal crime at the time, like interstate kidnapping or the use of a specific type of explosive, or it would have had to have happened on federal property.

It was Rosa Williams, Mr. Morris’s granddaughter, who moved Mr. Nelson to dedicate himself to this and the other cold cases. After he wrote his first article on the subject in 2007, in which he revealed that the owner of the shoe shop was on the F.B.I.’s list of unsolved civil rights murders, Ms. Williams called.

She told him she had never known what had happened to her grandfather, and she thanked him. She also asked Mr. Nelson to help figure out who killed her grandfather. “I told her I’m going to try,” he said.

From that moment on, Mr. Nelson has reported on little else. With the help of the Cold Case Justice Initiative at the Syracuse University College of Law, he went on to file more than 150 articles on the subject, culminating in this one, which he hopes will lead to an arrest.

But he is also motivated by the curiosity of a newsman.

“What kind of human being could set another man on fire?” he said. “I was just curious about something that happened in our community that I never knew about. I just wanted to find out who did it.”

Monday, November 08, 2010

Restoring Justice In Civil Rights Cold Cases | WBUR

Restoring Justice In Civil Rights Cold Cases | WBUR
The struggle for universal civil rights in this country is remembered as a non-violent revolution led by luminaries like Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, but many, many activists died for the cause. Margaret Burnham, a law professor at Northeastern University, hopes to make sure that none of the civil rights crusaders are ever forgotten.
Burnham runs the Civil Rights and Restorative Justice Project (CRRJ) at Northeastern where she and her students examine cases of injustice from the civil rights era and looks for ways to correct the historical record to help bring justice to victims.
Some civil rights activists were murdered for their work and some were wrongfully charged with crimes. In other cases, crimes against civil rights activists went unpunished. Burnham wants to bring these cases of injustice to light.
“We can’t change the sentence, which was obviously unfair,” Burnham said in an interview with Radio Boston’s Sacha Pfeiffer. “We do find ways of entering into the process to make those that were affected by it feel that they have now some stake in what transpired. And one of the ways that we can do that is to correct documents that we find mistake the facts.”
With help from her students at Northeastern, Burnham investigates anti-civil rights violence and helps provide communities impacted by that violence small measures of peace by unearthing truths that, in some cases, have long been buried.
Take the case of John Earle Reese.
Just 16 years old in 1955, Reese was shot to death in an East Texas cafe by white men hoping terrorize local blacks into shelving plans for a new school. The two men were arrested, but spent no time in jail.
“We do find ways of entering into the process to make those that were affected by it feel that they have now some stake in what transpired.”
–Margaret Burnham
Residents of Reese’s town said that the case was barely contested because in the 1950s, African-Americans had little power in much of the South.
“African-Americans were not part of the political process,” Burnham said. “They had no vote. They, effectively, were closed out of the political process, and therefore, they had nothing to say about all of the law enforcement officials and judicial officers who presided over the criminal justice process. There were no African-American police officers, there were no sheriffs, there were no judges. There were very, very few lawyers.”
Reese’s name had largely been forgotten, until students at the CRRJ spent two years looking into the circumstances surrounding his death.
Now, the town of Rusk County, Texas named a road after Reese and created a small memorial to remember his family’s tragedy.

Thursday, November 04, 2010

ACLU sues city police over 'stop and frisk' | Philadelphia Inquirer | 11/04/2010

ACLU sues city police over 'stop and frisk' | Philadelphia Inquirer | 11/04/2010
Civil rights attorneys filed a federal lawsuit today seeking to have the Philadelphia police department's "stop and frisk" policy declared unconstitutional.
The suit argues that police disproportionately target minorities, often stopping them and frisking them without sufficient grounds.
The suit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg.
Among the named plaintiffs are an African-American, Georgetown-educated lawyer who the suit says has been stopped four times since 2008 in West Philadelphia "without probable cause or reasonable suspicion," and a Hispanic University of Pennsylvania ethnographer stopped four times this year in neighborhoods around Kensington without ever facing charges.
Another plaintiff is state Rep. Jewell Williams, who was arrested in 2009 near his North Philadelphia home after he witnessed what he described as overly aggressive police tactics and attempted to intercede.
The lawsuit says pedestrian stops have more than doubled since 2005, to 253,333 in 2009. Of those pedestrians stopped, 72 percent were African-American and only 8 percent led to arrests.
"The majority of these arrests were for alleged criminal conduct that was entirely independent from the supposed reason for the stop and/or frisk in the first place," the suit says.
The plaintiffs are seeking class status and rulings to prevent the police from conducting pedestrian stops based on race or national origin.
The suit also asks the court to order more police training, supervision and monitoring to ensure that "stops, frisks, searches and detentions comport with constitutional requirements."

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Court Issues Decision On Civil Rights Coalition Lawsuit Against Arizona Racial Profiling Law | American Civil Liberties Union

Court Issues Decision On Civil Rights Coalition Lawsuit Against Arizona Racial Profiling Law | American Civil Liberties Union
PHOENIX, AZ – Plaintiffs in Friendly House et. al. v. Whiting et al. won an important legal victory in their constitutional challenge to SB 1070, Arizona’s racial profiling law. Among other things, the court found that the plaintiffs’ claim that “Racial discrimination was a motivating factor for [S.B.] 1070’s enactment” establishes a valid constitutional challenge to the law. This decision was filed in response to the defendants’ motions to dismiss the case and the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
Today’s order is an important first step in challenging this unconstitutional law. The civil rights coalition will continue its legal fight until all of SB 1070 is taken off the books.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Judge Advances Civil Rights Groups’ SB 1070 Lawsuit - COLORLINES

Judge Advances Civil Rights Groups’ SB 1070 Lawsuit - COLORLINES
On Friday a federal judge issued a ruling allowing a lawsuit against SB 1070 brought by a coalition of civil rights groups to move forward. U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton partially struck down motions from Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu to have the case dismissed. (Scroll down for a breakdown of the lawsuits against SB 1070.)
Bolton dismissed complaints from plaintiffs that said that SB 1070 would restrict immigrants’ speech and travel. The groups had argued that SB 1070 would make people afraid to speak languages besides English, and that is why it had to be struck down. Bolton rejected that complaint because she said the civil rights coalition was not the correct party to be bringing such claims. Nevertheless, civil rights groups are celebrating the broader ruling.
“Today’s order is an important first step in challenging this unconstitutional law,” the coalition said in a joint statement Friday. “The civil rights coalition will continue its legal fight until all of SB 1070 is taken off the books.”
The ACLU, National Immigration Law Center, Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, Asian Pacific American Legal Center, and NAACP filed their case against Arizona in May, charging that the state violated the Constitution by passing its own immigration law. The coalition of civil rights groups have argued that only the federal government has the right to create and enforce immigration policy.

Friday, October 08, 2010

Conservative Group Sues DOJ for Info on Its Decision to Sue Arizona « The Washington Independent

Conservative Group Sues DOJ for Info on Its Decision to Sue Arizona « The Washington Independent
Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, announced today that is has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice to try to get at the government’s reason for suing Arizona over its SB 1070 immigration law. The law’s most controversial provisions, including instructing local law enforcement officers to check immigration status while enforcing other laws, were blocked by a federal judge July 28. Before the case appears before an appeals court in November, Judicial Watch hopes to obtain “any and all communications between the Department of Justice and any third parties.”
Translation: They want to know whether the ACLU and other civil rights organizations that spoke out against the law influenced the DOJ’s decision to file a lawsuit July 6. The DOJ lawsuit was one of seven legal challenges to SB 1070, including a suit filed May 17 by the ACLU and a coalition of civil rights groups.