Contact Me By Email


What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.


This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Fragments of U.S.-Made Missile Seen in Photos Taken by Iran Near Deadly School Strike

 

Fragments of U.S.-Made Missile Seen in Photos Taken by Iran Near Deadly School Strike

“Iran released photos of missile fragments from a deadly strike on a school, claiming they were from a U.S.-made Tomahawk missile. The New York Times analyzed the photos and identified components consistent with a Tomahawk, including a steering mechanism and a satellite antenna. While the source of the fragments is unclear, the evidence suggests a U.S. strike, contradicting President Trump’s claim that Iran was responsible.

Iranian state media posted mangled remnants it claims were from the Feb. 28 attack in Minab. An analysis shows they have the markings of a missile made by American manufacturers

A wide shot showing the ruins of the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school in the background, with a green table in the foreground. On the table, several mangled pieces of metallic and electronic missile debris are displayed, including a SDL antenna and an actuator. The surrounding area is covered in gray concrete rubble and dust under an overcast sky.
A government handout photograph showed weapon remnants displayed on a table near the ruins of the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school, where a precision strike reportedly killed 175 people, mostly children, on Feb. 28. The remnants have been identified by The Times as components of a modern, U.S.-made Tomahawk missile.IRIB, via Telegram

Mangled missile fragments purporting to be from the deadly strikes that hit a naval base and elementary school in southern Iran on Feb. 28 bear the markings of an American cruise missile, according to an analysis by The New York Times.

Photos of the fragments were posted to Telegram by Iran’s state broadcaster and were characterized as showing “the remains of the American missile that landed on the children of Minab school.”

The debris is displayed on a table near the shell of the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school, most of which was destroyed in a precision strike, according to an earlier analysis by The Times. At least 175 people, most of them children, were reportedly killed.

A medium shot of a metal table holding several large pieces of charred and twisted missile wreckage. On the left, a rectangular mechanical steering actuator sits near a brown plastic crate. To the right, a damaged circuit board is seen, its internal microchips and wiring exposed.
Among the weapon remnants displayed, The Times identified U.S.-made components, including a steering mechanism and a satellite antenna.IRIB, via Telegram

While it is not clear where or how the fragments were recovered — or whether they pertain specifically to the school strike — they contain serial numbers and other details that are consistent with how the Department of Defense and its suppliers categorize and label munitions. The remnants appear to be from a U.S.-made Tomahawk cruise missile manufactured in 2014 or later.

Evidence analyzed by The New York Times has been mounting that the school was hit during a series of U.S. strikes targeting an adjacent naval base. On Sunday, a video was uploaded by Iran’s semiofficial Mehr News Agency, that The Times and other outlets identified as a Tomahawk cruise missile striking a medical building in the naval base. The Pentagon categorizes the Tomahawk as a precision-guided munition.

The Defense Department released videos of U.S. Navy warships firing Tomahawks at Iran on Feb. 28, the first day of the strikes, and the day the school was hit, and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in two separate appearances last week that Navy-launched Tomahawks were used to attack targets along Iran’s southern coast during the opening hours of the war.

On Saturday, Mr. Trump made the assertion that the school was hit by Iran without offering any proof. On Monday, he again posited that scenario.

“Iran also has some Tomahawks,” he said in response to questions from a New York Times reporter at a news conference. “As you know, numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us.”

During a press conference on Monday, President Trump suggested without evidence that Iran possessed Tomahawk missiles.

In fact, Iran has no Tomahawks. Any country the U.S. has sold Tomahawks to would have to obtain authorization from the State Department before transferring them to a third party, like Iran.

Mr. Trump also added that he was made aware that the Minab incident was under investigation and that whatever the results of that show he was “willing to live with it."

Besides the United States, only two countries are known to have Tomahawk missiles: Australia and Britain. Two additional countries have agreed to purchase them — Japan in 2024, and the Netherlands in 2025.

In October, Mr. Trump openly mused about providing Tomahawks to Ukraine, but never followed through on the idea.

Even if Iran were able to somehow obtain a Tomahawk, it lacks the technical equipment and capabilities that are used to program their flight paths and upload that data into the missile’s onboard computer. Iran would also have to be in possession of a launcher capable of firing a Tomahawk without damaging it.

Iran has produced two models of cruise missiles for attacking land-based targets. But both of those weapons have design features that visually set them apart from a Tomahawk, even when viewed from a distance.

In the photos of the weapons debris, one remnant is marked SDL ANTENNA, or satellite data link antenna, part of a communications system installed in more modern versions of the Tomahawk. A number unique to Department of Defense contracts indicates that the component was supplied to the U.S. military as part of a 2014 order. The name of Ball Aerospace Technologies, a weapons manufacturer based in Boulder, Colo., that was acquired by BAE in 2024, is imprinted on the part.

Source: Iran’s state-run IRIB news channel, via Telegram. Kenan Davis/The New York Times

Another remnant is stamped with “Made in USA” and bears the name of Globe Motors, an Ohio-based manufacturer. According to the official open-data source for American federal government spending, the company has been awarded millions of dollars in Department of Defense contracts for components, including the actuator motors used to move the guidance fins that steer Tomahawk missiles.

The photos match remnants documented in Tomahawk missile attacks in previous conflicts, including the Globe Motors component, as well as a circuit board, both photographed in Yemen, and archived by the Open Source Munitions Portal, a database of weapon fragments found in conflict zones. A similar Globe Motors component has also been found in Syria.

Trevor Ball, a former U.S. Army explosive ordnance disposal technician who works with the research collective Bellingcat, also identified the components as being part of a Tomahawk missile. He has identified similar missile remnants photographed at other attack sites in Iran since the start of the Israeli-U.S. war.

Shawn McCreesh contributed reporting.

Christiaan Triebert is a Times reporter working on the Visual Investigations team, a group that combines traditional reporting with digital sleuthing and analysis of visual evidence to verify and source facts from around the world.

John Ismay is a reporter covering the Pentagon for The Times. He served as an explosive ordnance disposal officer in the U.S. Navy.“

The Pentagon Cut Its Civilian Safeguards Before the Iran War

 

The Pentagon Cut Its Civilian Safeguards Before the Iran War

“The Pentagon, under Pete Hegseth’s leadership, significantly reduced staffing and resources dedicated to civilian protection strategies. This reduction, impacting a center established to minimize civilian casualties, has raised concerns about the potential consequences for civilian safety in ongoing conflicts.

As the civilian toll in Iran mounts, some officials point to the impact of Pete Hegseth’s hostility to battlefield restraint.

In this picture obtained from Iran's ISNA news agency, a mourner sprays flower petals on the coffins of children who were killed in a reported strike on a primary school in Iran's Hormozgan province during a funeral in Minab on March 3, 2026.
A mourner throws flower petals on coffins of children killed in a strike on a primary school on March 3, 2026, in this photograph released by Iran's ISNA news agency. (Amirhossein Khorgooei / ISNA / AFP / Getty)

Even before President Trump returned to office, his advisers sought to remove what they saw as unnecessary constraints on the way the American military fights. The man Trump had tapped to lead the Pentagon, Pete Hegseth, had long complained about “weak” and “woke” policies that he believed were hampering the cause of battlefield victory.

In early 2025, ahead of Trump’s second inauguration, members of his transition team asked military officials to review and potentially close a unit—a “center of excellence,” in Pentagon parlance—established to help the military devise better strategies to protect civilians. The creation of the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence in 2023 was part of an effort to understand why thousands of noncombatants had died in the battle against the Islamic State terrorist group and to find ways to limit civilian deaths in counterinsurgency struggles.

The center was created by law, so it couldn’t be closed outright. But the administration has dramatically reduced staffing there and fired or reassigned personnel focused on preventing civilian harm across the military. Total staff working on the issue across the military, which numbered nearly 200 at its peak, has been reduced by about 90 percent over the past year, people familiar with the matter told me.”

Monday, March 09, 2026

UPDATE: Legal Concerns Mount For Trump Following Andrew's Arrest, Prof. David Cay Johnston - YouTube

 

RFK Jr. & HHS: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - YouTube

RFK Jr. & HHS: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - YouTube

USAID: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - YouTube

 

What was Trump truly after in Fulton County? - YouTube

 

U.S. Tomahawk Hit Naval Base Beside Iranian School, Video Shows - The New York Times

U.S. Tomahawk Hit Naval Base Beside Iranian School, Video Shows


"The evidence contradicts President Trump’s claim that Iran was responsible for a strike at the school that killed 175 people, most of them children.


A

By Malachy Browne and John Ismay

Malachy Browne is an expert in verifying online imagery, and John Ismay is a former Navy bomb disposal officer.

The video, uploaded on Sunday by Iran’s semiofficial Mehr News Agency and verified by The New York Times, shows a Tomahawk cruise missile striking a naval base beside the school in the town of Minab on Feb. 28. The U.S. military is the only force involved in the conflict that uses Tomahawk missiles.

A body of evidence assembled by The Times — including satellite imagery, social media posts and other verified videos — indicates that the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school building was severely damaged by a precision strike that occurred at the same time as attacks on the naval base. The base is operated by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

Asked by a reporter from The Times on Saturday if the United States had bombed the school, President Trump said: “No. In my opinion and based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran.” He said, “They’re very inaccurate, as you know, with their munitions.”
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was standing beside Mr. Trump, said the Pentagon was investigating, “but the only side that targets civilians is Iran.”

President Trump said he believed that Iran was responsible for a strike on an elementary school that reportedly killed 175 people.

The video of the strike, which was first reported by the research collective Bellingcat, was independently verified by The Times. We compared features visible in the footage to new satellite imagery captured days after the strikes in Minab.

The video was filmed from a construction site opposite the base and shows a worn, dirt path across a grassy area and piles of debris also evident in recent satellite imagery, bolstering its credibility. The video also comports with other verified videos taken in the immediate aftermath of the strikes.

A Times analysis of the video shows the missile striking a building described as a medical clinic in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps base. Plumes of smoke and debris shoot out of the building after it is hit as the distant screams of onlookers are heard.

As the camera pans to the right, large plumes of dust and smoke are already billowing from the area around the elementary school, suggesting that it had been struck shortly before the strike on the naval base. This is supported by a timeline of the strikesassembled by The Times that shows the school was hit around the time as the base.

Several other buildings inside the naval base were also hit by precision strikes in the attack, an analysis of satellite imagery showed. Determining precisely what happened has been impeded by the lack of visible weapons fragments and the inability of outside reporters to reach the scene.

The Times has identified the weapon seen in the new video as a Tomahawk cruise missile, a weapon that neither the Israeli military nor the Iranian military has. Dozens of Tomahawks have been launched by U.S. Navy warships into Iran since Feb. 28, when the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran began.

U.S. Central Command said a video it released of several Tomahawks being launched from Navy ships was filmed on Feb. 28, the day the Iranian base and school were hit.

The Defense Department describes Tomahawks as “long-range, highly accurate” guided missiles that can fly about 1,000 miles. They are programmed with a specific flight plan before launch, and the missiles steer themselves to their targets.

Each Tomahawk is about 20 feet long and has a wingspan of eight and a half feet, according to the Navy. The most commonly used Tomahawks have warheads that contain the explosive power of about 300 pounds of TNT.

Trevor Ball, a former U.S. Army explosive ordnance disposal technician who works with Bellingcat, also identified the missile in the video as a Tomahawk, as did another weapons expert, Chris Cobb-Smith, director of Chiron Resources, a security and logistics agency.

Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference on Wednesday that U.S. forces were carrying out strikes in southern Iran at the time the naval base and school were hit. A map he presented showed that an area including Minab, which is near the Strait of Hormuz, had been targeted by strikes in the first 100 hours of the operation, although it did not explicitly identify the town.

“Along the southern axis, the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln strike group has continued to provide pressure from the sea along the southeastern side of the coast and has been attriting naval capability all along the strait,” the general said.

It is not the only time that General Caine has acknowledged the role Tomahawk missiles played in the early hours of the war.

“The first shooters at sea were Tomahawks unleashed by the United States Navy,” he said in a briefing to reporters at the Pentagon on March 2, as the Navy “began to conduct strikes across the southern flank in Iran.”

In June, a Navy submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawks at a nuclear facility in Isfahan, Iran, as part of the 12-Day war.

Shawn McCreesh contributed reporting. Shawn Paik and McKinnon de Kuypercontributed video production.

John Ismay is a reporter covering the Pentagon for The Times. He served as an explosive ordnance disposal officer in the U.S. Navy."


U.S. Tomahawk Hit Naval Base Beside Iranian School, Video Shows - The New York Times

Sunday, March 08, 2026

Another Land Grab? Israel Intensifies Bombardment of Lebanon & Orders Mass Displacement in the South | Democracy Now!

Another Land Grab? Israel Intensifies Bombardment of Lebanon & Orders Mass Displacement in the South | Democracy Now!

Vital Water Desalination Plants in Iran and Bahrain Are Attacked - The New York Times

Vital Desalination Plants in Iran and Bahrain Are Attacked

"Strikes on nonmilitary infrastructure were a “serious escalation,” analysts said, and could widen the war’s impact on civilians.

A sprawling seaside city, seen from a plane, spreads out across a desert landscape.
A view of Bahrain from the window of a plane in 2023. Persian Gulf countries depend heavily on desalination technology.RuelleRuelle/Universal Images Group, via Getty Images

Water desalination plants have come under attack in Iran and on the Persian Gulf island of Bahrain over the weekend, threatening a resource vital to life in the harsh desert climates of the region.

On Saturday, Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, accused the United States of attacking a desalination plant on Qeshm Island, affecting the water supply for 30 villages.

“The U.S. set this precedent, not Iran,” he said on social media, calling the attack “a dangerous move with grave consequences.”

Capt. Tim Hawkins, a spokesman for the U.S. Central Command, said that U.S. forces were not responsible for that attack.

A day later, Bahrain’s interior ministry said that an Iranian drone had “caused material damage” to a desalination plant there, accusing Iran of “indiscriminately” attacking civilian targets. The country’s water and electricity authority said there had been “no impact on water supplies or water network capacity.”

It was not immediately clear whether either plant was still functioning. And there was no immediate comment from Iran on Bahrain’s allegation.

Iran has faced severe water shortages in recent years, and Gulf countries like Bahrain depend heavily on desalination technology — which turns seawater into drinking water — to sustain tens of millions of people. Desalination infrastructure is one of the most vulnerable military targets in the region because without it, the Gulf’s sprawling metropolises would effectively collapse.

“Targeting a desalination plant in Bahrain crosses an important threshold and represents a serious escalation,” said Abdullah Baabood, an Omani academic at Waseda University in Japan.

“In the Gulf, desalination facilities are not merely infrastructure,” he added. “They are essential lifelines that supply drinking water to millions. Striking them risks turning a military confrontation into a direct threat to civilian survival.”

Iranian officials have said that their attacks in the Gulf countries, which are close allies of the United States, are a response to the intense American-Israeli bombing campaign that began in Iran on Feb. 28 and that they are aimed at American military bases and U.S. soldiers, not civilians.

However, the hundreds of Iranian missiles and drones shot at the Gulf countries over the past week have also damaged civilian infrastructure, including airports, hotels and energy facilities. Gulf military forces, which have advanced missile-defense systems, have intercepted a vast majority of those attacks. But at least 10 civilians have been killed, according to a New York Times tally of official announcements.

Political analysts and diplomats have long warned about the vulnerability of desalination plants in the region should they become military targets.

In 2008, a diplomatic cable sent from the U.S. embassy in the Saudi capital, Riyadh, and later released by WikiLeaks warned that a single desalination plant provided Riyadh with more than 90 percent of its drinking water at the time.

The city “would have to evacuate within a week if the plant, its pipelines or associated power infrastructure were seriously damaged or destroyed,” the author wrote. “The current structure of the Saudi government could not exist” without the plant, the cable added.

Since then, the Saudi government has invested significantly in expanding water storage,reducing its vulnerability.

At the same time, the region’s cities have grown rapidly, drawing in large populations of foreign workers and straining the fragile ecosystems that underpin them.

Eric Schmitt contributed reporting from Washington.

Vivian Nereim is the lead reporter for The Times covering the countries of the Arabian Peninsula. She is based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia."

Vital Water Desalination Plants in Iran and Bahrain Are Attacked - The New York Times

Saturday, March 07, 2026

Kash Patel PANICS After Senator Cory Booker EXPOSES Him In Explosive Hearing

 

US-Iran Wacast Update - Day 7 - Live w/ Malcolm Nance & jacob Kaarsbo - YouTube

 

LAWYER: If Cops Ask "Where You Coming From?" Say THIS (One-Sentence Script) - YouTube

 

‘We were ready’: Democratic attorneys general lead fight to stop Trump | US politics | The Guardian

‘We were ready’: Democratic attorneys general lead fight to stop Trump

"As some elected leaders choose to play nice with the president, Democratic AGs have done the opposite – to impressive effect

Collage of politicians
Democratic attorneys general have filed more than 50 lawsuits against the Trump administration.Composite: Rita Liu/The Guardian/Getty Images/Alamy

Four Democratic attorneys general, sitting in their offices from New York to California with state flags and books behind them, announced a new lawsuit on Thursday, alleging the president, yet again, had broken the law by attempting to create new tariffs without congressional approval.

It’s a now familiar scene for the group of top law-enforcement officials who have collectively filed more than 50 lawsuits against the Trump administration, serving as a counterweight to the president’s quest to expand his power and circumvent the constitution.

They’ve protected billions of dollars for their states. They’ve stopped or stalled policies that would have cut food benefits during a government shutdown, closed health programs and job training, curtailed funds for crime victims, ended birthright citizenship, cut off funds for schools, and kept illegal tariffs in place.

At a time when some institutions and elected leaders have chosen to play nice with the Trump administration, the 23 Democratic attorneys general have done the opposite.

“We know the most impactful elected position right now is the Democratic AG,” said Andrea Campbell, the attorney general of Massachusetts.

Their lawsuits have a high success rate: about 80% have gotten a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, Arizona attorney general Kris Mayes estimated. She has signed on to nearly 40 lawsuits filed by Democratic attorneys general against the administration.

Joint lawsuits by attorneys general aren’t new. Republican attorneys general have banded together on suits against Democratic administrations, and they currently have filed joint briefs to defend Trump policies. Cross-partisan groups of attorneys general often work collaboratively on lawsuits over opioids or predatory businesses.

But the sheer number of lawsuits in the past year-plus from Democratic attorneys general outpaces prior efforts. The scope of their legal work is broad – and growing. Just recently, the actor Mark Ruffalo on social media called on state attorneys general to band together to fight the potential Paramount/Warner Bros merger, and California attorney general Rob Bonta responded that he is “in conversation with” his attorney general colleagues about the issue.

The almost two dozen Democratic attorneys general and their staffs have met regularly since before Trump returned to the White House. Even before Trump won in November 2024, they were preparing for a potential Trump presidency, combing through his comments and Republican plans like Project 2025 to prepare the kinds of lawsuits they expected to file.

When Trump started his second presidency with an executive order that sought to reverse birthright citizenship, disallowing those born in the US by foreign parents from being citizens, the Democratic attorneys general sued him the next day, one group of many that brought suit. The order was blocked by the courts and will be heard by the US supreme court in April.

Part of the group’s success comes from its preparation, but, several attorneys general told the Guardian, they wouldn’t be winning so much if the Trump administration wasn’t blatantly breaking the law.

“I’d like to say that we’re winning these cases because we’re all a bunch of Johnnie Cochrans or Perry Masons or whatever,” Minnesota attorney general Keith Ellison said. “But the truth is, what he’s doing is patently illegal, and a 1L law student would know it.”

The attorneys general’s offices have added lawyers and refocused staff to focus on federal accountability, finding that the cost of Trump’s lawlessness exceeds the costs of additional attorneys.

“He’s taking money out of our state,” said Ellison, who has filed more than 50 lawsuits against the Trump administration since last January. “One thing we cannot do is just let them pick Minnesota’s pocket.”

Meanwhile, their Republican colleagues are entirely absent, even when the issue at hand, like massive tariffs on local businesses, also affect red states.

“They’ve been just uninterested and supine, and I think they’re secretly rooting for us, because when we deliver a victory and get tariffs struck down, their residents benefit, their businesses benefit,” Bonta said in a recent press conference.

While some cases resulted in reversals of policies for all states or blocked them from taking effect nationwide, the US supreme court limited universal injunctions in mid-2025, meaning only states signed on to litigation can receive relief in a given case.

“So it has never before been so important to have an attorney general willing to stand up for consumers and citizens as it is today,” Mayes said. “If you don’t have a Democratic AG, you are going to get hurt by the Trump administration. And the irony of all of this is that it is the Republican AGs and their states that are getting pummeled by Trump because they’re not getting the same relief that we are.”

The Democratic AGs often implore their Republican colleagues to join their lawsuits and protect money that would be coming to their states, but they know the political dynamics – namely, a vindictive president willing to rally his followers against them – come into play.

“I know they care about their states, but they’re afraid,” Delaware attorney general Kathy Jennings said. “They’re flat-out afraid. There’s nothing else I can say about it, except that they will not stand up to this man for fear of repercussions that either they personally will be faced with or that their constituents will face.”

Adam Piper, the executive director of the Republican Attorneys General Association (Raga), said Republican attorneys general sued the Biden administration multiples times “to make America safer, energy more affordable, and our border more secure” while the Democratic attorneys general have “prioritized political witch hunts against President Trump”.

“These different approaches make it clear that Attorneys General are on the frontline of the policy fights that impact Americans the most – making AG races the most important statewide contests this November,” Piper said.


A few of the Democratic AGs served for at least part of Trump’s first term, but they knew his second term would be different. There would be few, if any, dissenting voices around the president to stall his plans. He would be more prepared to enact the laundry list of policies he’d been touting on the campaign trail. They better understood that Trump’s bluster wasn’t just words – his projecting should be taken seriously.

The attorneys general began talking in early 2024 and met regularly to map out how they would respond on key issues.

They met in person that year to go through Project 2025 and other plans Trump had made public, Ellison said. They split into groups to focus on rule of law, immigration, schools, LGBTQ+ and trans rights, diversity. They discussed and wrote memos about how they could show they had standing to sue. They talked about which states to file lawsuits in, based on where they believed they had advantages, he said.

Their full-court press against Trump began right when he took office, and it hasn’t waned since.

“We were geared up,” said Jennings, of Delaware. “We were ready, and we’ve stayed ready each and every day since then.”

Their plan included public engagement. They set out on town halls across the country, which doubled as a way to collect evidence for current and future cases, and rally their supporters to get more involved in fighting back. While Americans have since joined mass protests and boycotts, there was little public resistance when the attorneys general began their town halls in early 2025. A Minnesota town hall in March was standing room only, and the AGs received standing ovations.

The attorneys general still meet regularly, as often as twice a week via video, Mayes said. Their staffs are in communication daily.

These meetings allow them to share what’s happening on the ground in their states, said Oregon attorney general Dan Rayfield. Sometimes, an issue might be more isolated, but usually when an issue is raised, other states are seeing it too, he said.

They collectively decide which states will lead on a given case, usually according to who has the expertise and availability.

“The reality of the AG world is that New York and California are the big dogs – they really do have way more people than the rest of us,” Ellison said. “And so oftentimes they’re contributing more, according to their ability. But then there’s a lot of states that punch above their weight.”

For Campbell, doing nothing was never an option. She does her work because she believes in service and helping people, and she has a responsibility to protect Massachusetts residents and the state’s economy – and the rule of law in general.

“We’re exercising courage to stand up, not only for our residents, but for the constitution,” she said. “And we know without a constitution, you can’t have a functioning state economy.”


‘We were ready’: Democratic attorneys general lead fight to stop Trump | US politics | The Guardian