Contact Me By Email


What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.


This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Trump’s EPSTEIN EVIDENCE BOMB goes off: Ari on email about Trump’s “hour...

Trump Spent Hours With Epstein’s Most Tragic Victim

Trump Spent Hours With Epstein’s Most Tragic Victim

OUTED THE VICTIM

"Moments after explosive new emails reignited the Epstein firestorm, MAGA Republicans named the victim at the heart of them.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, with a photo of herself as a teen, when she says she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew, among others. (Emily Michot/Miami Herald/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
Miami Herald/TNS/Getty Images

Donald Trump spent hours with a sex trafficking victim that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell recruited from his Mar-a-Lago club and abused for years.

Moments after explosive new emails suggested the president may have known more about Epstein’s conduct than he has previously acknowledged, MAGA Republicans identified the victim at the heart of the documents as the late Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s most high-profile survivor.

A photo composite of Donald Trump, Virginia Giuffre, and Jeffrey Epstein.
A photo composite of Donald Trump, Virginia Giuffre, and Jeffrey Epstein.The Daily Beast/Getty/Reuters

In one email to Maxwell, which was dated April 2, 2011, Epstein refers to Trump as “the dog that hasn’t barked” and reveals that a certain victim—whose name was redacted in the files—“spent hours at my house with him.”

The emails form part of a cache of documents provided by Epstein’s estate to Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

From left, American real estate developer Donald Trump and his girlfriend (and future wife), former model Melania Knauss, financier (and future convicted sex offender) Jeffrey Epstein, and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell pose together at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000. (Photo by Davidoff Studios/Getty Images)
Davidoff Studios/Getty Images

However, soon after they were released on Wednesday morning, Republicans on the committee posted on X: “Why did Democrats cover up the name when the Estate didn’t redact it in the redacted documents provided to the committee? It’s because this victim, Virginia Giuffre, publicly said that she never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump.

“Democrats are trying to create a fake narrative to slander President Trump,” they added. “Shame on them.”

Giuffre, born Virginia Roberts, was one of the earliest and loudest voices calling for criminal charges against Epstein and his enablers.

She lit a fire under the Epstein scandal in 2011, bringing it into the international spotlight when she alleged that she had been sexually assaulted by Prince Andrew as part of Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.

Her astonishing revelations turned the now-ex prince into Britain’s most tarnished royal, and contributed to him losing his royal titles last month.

Before she died by suicide earlier this year, Giuffre had testified that Maxwell hired her as a masseuse for Epstein after meeting her at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, where she worked as a 16-year-old locker room attendant at the resort spa.

Prince Andrew with Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Prince Andrew rejected allegations he slept with an underage Virginia Guiffre.Virginia Roberts Giuffre/Fair Use

Maxwell, a British socialite, spotted Giuffre as she was reading a book about massage therapy. She then offered her a job interview to be a private, traveling masseuse, suggesting it would be a potentially life-changing opportunity.

Giuffre attended the interview at Epstein’s Palm Beach home, where she was introduced to Epstein naked and instructed by Maxwell on how to massage him.

The depraved couple soon made her their sex slave, pressuring her into gratifying not only the disgraced financier but also his friends and associates.

A view of the patio at Mar-a-Lago on Nov. 12, 2005. (Evan Agostini/Getty Images)
A view of the patio at Mar-a-Lago.Evan Agostini/Getty Images

As the firestorm surrounding the Epstein files escalated this year, Trump acknowledged in July that he knew Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago and lamented how Epstein “stole her” from him.

“I think she worked at the spa,” he told reporters at the time. “I think that was one of the people. He stole her.”

“Other people would come and complain, this guy is taking people from the spa,” he added.

“I didn’t know that. And then when I heard about it, I told him, I said: ‘Listen, we don’t want you taking our people—whether it was spa or not spa—I don’t want you to take our people. And he was fine, and then not too long after that, he did it again. And I said: out of here!”

But while the president has long described the Epstein files as a “Democratic hoax,” the new emails raise questions about what he knew and when in relation to Epstein’s sexual conduct.

The documents suggest that Epstein mentioned Trump by name multiple times in private correspondence over the last 15 years.

In another email, written to author Michael Wolff on January 31, 2019, Epstein seems to address Trump’s earlier claim that he asked the sex offender to resign his membership at the president’s Mar-a-Lago Club.

“trump said he asked me to resign,” Epstein wrote, adding, “never a member ever. . of course he knew about the girls as he asked to Ghislaine to stop.”

The president did not receive or send any of the messages, nor has he been accused of any criminal wrongdoing in connection with Epstein or Maxwell.

However, the latest revelations are certain to inflame tensions about the administration’s handling of the Epstein files and the decision by Trump’s Department of Justice to renege on a pledge to fully release them.

House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia said the emails formed part of about 23,000 documents they received from Epstein’s estate in the last few days, and more would be released later today.

Britt Jacovich, spokesperson for progressive group MoveOn Civic Action, said: “It’s no wonder why Trump and Republicans have spent weeks hiding the Epstein emails and files from the public. This is textbook corruption.

“Just as Trump promised on the campaign trail, the American people deserve to know who enabled Jeffrey Epstein’s abuses and his victims deserve justice. Release the Epstein files.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt described the latest Esptein firestorm as a “hoax” designed to distract from the president’s achievements.

“The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump. The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and “couldn’t have been friendlier” to her in their limited interactions,” she said."



Supreme Court Extends Order Allowing Limits on Food Stamp Payments - The New York Times

Supreme Court Extends Order Allowing Limits on Food Stamp Payments



The Supreme Court extended on Tuesday a temporary ruling that allowed the Trump administration to withhold full food stamp benefits while Congress worked to advance a measure to end the government shutdown.

The new order will expire just before midnight on Thursday, giving lawmakers and President Trump two more days to approve and sign a government funding bill. The House is expected to vote as early as Wednesday on a measure passed by the Senate.

But the order, however briefly, extended delays and uncertainty for millions of Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the nation’s largest anti-hunger initiative. They were already confronting new delays and disruptions to their benefits after the court’s initial ruling last week.

The new order did not give a vote count or include the court’s reasoning, which is common in such emergency rulings.

On Friday evening, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, one of the court’s three liberals, had temporarily granted an emergency request by the Trump administration to block a lower court judge’s order that the government fund the anti-hunger program during the shutdown.

Justice Jackson, who has written critically of many Trump administration policies, handled the emergency request because she is assigned to applications from the region of the country where the case originated.

After Justice Jackson granted the temporary pause, she set a speedy briefing schedule in the food stamp case. Both the Trump administration and the challengers had laid out their cases to the justices by early Tuesday.

The court’s emergency ruling on Tuesday noted that the matter now had been referred to the full court. The order also said Justice Jackson would have denied both the Trump administration’s request for an extension from the court and its emergency application.

Roughly 42 million Americans use monthly SNAP benefits to buy groceries. Although the government has enough money in reserves to fund the program, Mr. Trump has refused to do so. The president’s actions in the fight over funding the food stamp program during the shutdown stand in stark contrast with the other ways he has rearranged the budget as the government remained closed, including billions to pay for officers conducting mass deportations.

A group of cities, religious groups and nonprofits had sued to force the Trump administration to fund SNAP during the shutdown. They brought a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island and argued that the administration had both a legal and a moral obligation to fund the program.

A federal district judge, John J. McConnell Jr., agreed and ordered the White House to fund SNAP. The Justice Department quickly appealed the ruling, asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to weigh in. That court on Friday declined to impose a temporary block on Judge McConnell’s order, prompting the administration to seek an emergency pause, known as an administrative stay, from the Supreme Court on Friday night.

In a brief to the court, lawyers for the Trump administration had urged the justices to continue to block the lower court order, allowing the government to withhold food stamp benefits as the shutdown continued.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer, in a court filing on Monday, asserted that the lower courts had injected themselves into “the political branches’ closing efforts to end this shutdown” by requiring the Trump administration to fund the food benefits, causing “irreparable harms” by deciding “how to triage limited funds.”

In response, the groups challenging the Trump administration urged the court to lift the pause and clear the way for full funding of the program. In a brief to the justices, the challengers argued that “people and families have now gone 10 days without the help they need to afford food,” asserting that any further delays “would prolong that irreparable harm and add to the chaos the government has unleashed, with lasting impacts” on the food benefit program.

Abbie VanSickle covers the United States Supreme Court for The Times. She is a lawyer and has an extensive background in investigative reporting."


Supreme Court Extends Order Allowing Limits on Food Stamp Payments - The New York Times

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

How We Got Here: Jelani Cobb on Rise of Trump & White Nationalism After Push for Racial Justice | Democracy Now!



How We Got Here: Jelani Cobb on Rise of Trump & White Nationalism After Push for Racial Justice | Democracy Now!

Calls For Schumer to Step Down Grow as Democrats Cave on Healthcare & Help GOP Pass Funding Bill | Democracy Now!




Calls For Schumer to Step Down Grow as Democrats Cave on Healthcare & Help GOP Pass Funding Bill | Democracy Now!

Dutch officials rebuke Trump admin over removal of Black WWII vet memorials

Dutch officials rebuke Trump admin over removal of Black WWII vet memorials


The Trump administration’s bigoted assault on historical accuracy — and in particular, history involving Black people — has become an international embarrassment. And some Dutch officials are making it clear they want no part in such a crusade.

Officials in the province of Limburg are rebuking the Trump administration and demanding answers over reports that two informational panels honoring a war hero named George Pruitt and referencing the segregation faced by Black troops were quietly removed from the visitors center at the Netherlands American Cemetery in Martgaarten.

Even as they endured racism from their white peers in the U.S. military, Black soldiers played key roles in liberating the Netherlands from the Nazis.

A spokesperson for the American Battle Monuments Commission, the federal agency that oversees U.S. military cemeteries, previously told Dutch news outlet NRC that the panels were “designed to be rotated regularly throughout the exhibition” and claimed the Pruitt panel was “currently not on display, but not out of rotation.”

In response, sources told Newsweek’s Ellie Cook that local officials in Limburg weren’t notified about the removals, that neither of the panels were on display as of Monday morning, and that the commission’s rationale still doesn’t seem to address the removal of the panel about segregation.

The commission did not immediately respond Monday to MSNBC’s emailed request for comment.

Dutch officials are incensed, according to Netherlands-focused news outlet NL Times:

The removal of the panels about the Black Americans who took part in the effort is ‘indecent and unacceptable,’ said the joint statement from eleven political parties in Limburg. They stated the move ‘does not do justice to history.’ They submitted written questions to the provincial executive body, in part to determine whether the municipal government can have the panels replaced. Limburg King’s Commissioner Emile Roemer said that the province also shares the ‘serious concerns’ about the U.S. apparently whitewashing Black history at the American cemetery. He will soon meet with the American ambassador to discuss the matter.

Roemer, Limburg’s top official, said he will “urgently appeal” to U.S. Ambassador to the Netherlands Joseph Popolo and the commission “to put the panels back where they belong.”

Donald Trump has openly complained about the Smithsonian teaching “how bad slavery was,” his administration has instituted pro-segregation policies, and his defense secretary has openly rebuked the idea that diversity is benefit to the United States military. It’s no wonder why, despite the monuments commission’s claims, Dutch officials aren’t chalking this incident up to mere coincidence.

Ja’han Jones is an MSNBC opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog. He is a futurist and multimedia producer focused on culture and politics. His previous projects include “Black Hair Defined” and the “Black Obituary Project.”


Dutch officials rebuke Trump admin over removal of Black WWII vet memorials