Contact Me By Email


What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.


This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

He Was Deported to a Country He’d Never Heard of. He May Never Go Free.

 

He Was Deported to a Country He’d Never Heard of. He May Never Go Free.

 Summary

Roberto Mosquera was deported to Eswatini and remains in indefinite detention without charges. The Trump administration uses third-country deals, including $5.1 million to Eswatini, creating global limbo for deportees.

As the Trump administration sends a growing number of immigrants to countries they have no connection to, some find themselves imprisoned with no way out.

A portrait of a man with short hair and a gray goatee in orange “CORRECTIONAL” prison garb, against a slate-gray background, looking off into the distance.
Roberto Mosquera in detention in Eswatini.Moises Saman/Magnum, for The New York Times

By Nicholas Casey

Nicholas Casey spoke to deportees imprisoned in Eswatini, via a cellphone one of them obtained following a hunger strike.

As he stepped out of the American military cargo plane, Roberto Mosquera still couldn’t tell where he was or why he had been taken there. When federal immigration agents forced him onto a secret flight 30 hours earlier, it was a hot July afternoon in Texas. Now, after traveling thousands of miles, he felt a cold winter’s morning in the air.

Listen to this article, read by Ron Butler

He was in the kingdom of Eswatini, a tiny, landlocked country in southern Africa that until recently was called Swaziland. Mosquera had never heard of it. He hadn’t set foot outside the United States since he was 12, when he arrived on a fishing boat as part of the 1980 Mariel boatlift from Cuba with his mother, a sister and her infant daughter. As a teenager, he joined a Miami gang, and in his 20s, he took a plea deal after being charged with attempted murder for shooting a rival gangster in the leg. That would have been grounds to deport him had he been from almost any other country. But Cuba wasn’t cooperating with the United States on deportations, so Mosquera was allowed to stay, provided he checked in with the authorities each year. He built a new life for himself, becoming a specialty plumber and a born-again Christian; he married and had four daughters.

Then one day in June of last year, Mosquera, who is 59, went to renew his work permit at an immigration office. The appointment was usually short; Mosquera had borrowed the company truck so that he could head to a job when he was done. But it didn’t turn out that way. An immigration official told him that his time in America was up. With President Trump now back in office, Mosquera knew these were not empty words. But if the United States couldn’t send him to Cuba, where would he go?

He was taken to the Krome Detention Center, a notorious holding facility for deportees in Miami, then to another in El Paso, Texas, where he was confined without being able to contact lawyers for nearly two weeks. Soon agents told him to get ready to move again. Mosquera was surprised when he was loaded onto a small luxury jet — it seemed to him more like something the singer Marc Anthony would rent, he told me. Along with him were four other detainees, from, as he would later learn, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen and Vietnam. They were transferred to a military cargo plane at a U.S. air base in the East African nation Djibouti, and more than a day later, the five men landed in Eswatini.

Before they could make sense of the situation, they were forced inside a metal cage that was fitted onto a transport truck and driven to the Matsapha Correctional Complex, Eswatini’s maximum-security prison. In a post on X, the Department of Homeland Security had called Mosquera and the four other men “depraved monsters” who were “so uniquely barbaric their home countries refuse to take them back.” Now they were met by dozens of guards wielding large sticks.

A man in orange prison attire poses for a full-length portrait, standing amid the red earth and scrubby greenery of what seems to be a prison yard, with a concrete structure and wall behind him.
Mosquera was deported to Eswatini as part of the Trump’s administration’s expanding practice of sending immigrants to third countries when they cannot be deported to their own.Moises Saman/Magnum, for The New York Times

That was more than a year ago. Mosquera still sits in that same maximum-security prison with nowhere to go. No charges against him. No way to appeal his predicament. No sign that he will ever be freed. Cuba has not signaled any willingness to take him, and Mosquera says he has no desire to go there. Eswatini will not release him from prison, even though he served his time in the United States and committed no crime in Africa.

I first heard about his case through Alma David, an immigration lawyer at Novo Legal Group in the United States, who represents him. When I reached Mosquera on a WhatsApp video call in early June, he had already spent 11 months behind bars. The Eswatini government refused to let me visit him or any of the others detained with him, so WhatsApp video calls were our main means of communication. As we spoke, Mosquera squinted at me; in detention, he had developed glaucoma, and a doctor told Mosquera he had lost half his vision in one eye and 80 percent in the other. He has struggled to receive treatment for the condition.

“Can I ask you a question?” Mosquera asked me. Behind him I could see the green bars of his cell where he spends his nights and the silhouettes of some of the other prisoners.

“Do you think I’ll ever get out of here?”

Mosquera is one of a growing number of people whom the Trump administration has put into a global administrative limbo. For more than a year, it has been offering millions of dollars — often without disclosing the payments— to foreign governments to take immigrants the United States was having trouble deporting to their countries of origin. This includes not only people with criminal pasts like Mosquera but also deportees who were under court protections not to be returned to their homelands because they faced threats there.

The practice of deporting someone to a so-called third country isn’t new, but it used to be rare. In the past, the United States might deport someone to a place deemed safe — Canada, for instance — or to a country where they had dual citizenship. But in 2019, the first Trump administration began sending thousands of foreign nationals, including people from the Caribbean and Central America, to Mexico. In Trump’s second term, the practice has vastly expanded: At least 35 countries have made deals to take deportees, a list that includes nations as far-flung as South Sudan, Ghana, Palau, Uzbekistan and Moldova, according to Third Country Deportation Watch, a monitoring group that tracks the agreements.

The deportations bring up serious legal questions that have been the subjectof multiple federal lawsuits. The removals — whether they involve immigrants with criminal histories or not — often happen before deportees can argue their cases before a judge. Some of the countries selected by the Trump administration don’t offer the basic legal protections to which the deportees would be entitled in the United States, such as access to a lawyer. And because they are foreign nationals, with no legal status in the countries to which they have been sent, the deportees generally remain under indefinite detention abroad, without charges and with little or no recourse in American courts. In a written statement to The Times, the Department of Homeland Security maintained that anyone who was deported received due process: “These third-country agreements, which ensure due process under the U.S. Constitution, are essential to the safety of our homeland and the American people.”

A number of the countries that have made the deals are unstable or autocraticand usually desperate for American cash. The Central African Republic is in the middle of a civil war. The Democratic Republic of Congo took 15 deportees shortly before the recent Ebola outbreak. Eswatini, which received $5.1 millionin its arrangement with the Trump administration, is one of the world’s last absolute monarchies.

The deals first drew widespread attention when the autocratic President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador accepted a $6 million payment in March 2025 to hold some 250 Venezuelan immigrants in CECOT, his Terrorism Confinement Center, a megaprison he had recently built to house as many as 40,000 Salvadoran gang members. The Venezuelans were later flown home, and many claimed that they were abused and tortured by their prison guards while in custody.

A low, tan building with a brick entrance and dark windows that seam to be heavily barred or blocked, with light entering only via slits, and a dry lawn in front of the building.
The Matsapha Correctional Complex in Eswatini, where Mosquera and other people deported by the United States have been held.Moises Saman/Magnum, for The New York Times

The detention archipelago started growing last fall, when the Trump administration began directing flights to Ghana and Cameroon. Human rights lawyers said that this wave of deportees was made up of immigrants seeking asylum who were protected by court orders from being returned to the countries they had fled. Some were also covered under the Convention Against Torture, a United Nations treaty to which the United States is a signatory, which bans the deportation of people to a country where they were tortured or could face torture.

“They have legal protection which means they cannot be deported to their country of origin, and the U.S. is exploiting that protection by deporting them to other countries instead,” says Bella Mosselmans, director of the Global Strategic Litigation Council, a rights group that has filed multiple lawsuits in the United States and abroad over third-country deportations. “It is then enlisting those countries to detain and deport them back to their country of origin, where they face persecution, torture and worse.” This workaround, known in international law as chain refoulement, is banned under the Convention Against Torture.

But some never get out. They remain in the third countries to which they are sent, stuck in a kind of purgatory — a new class of prisoner created by America’s widening crackdown on immigration.

Human rights lawyers I spoke to have identified at least two dozen cases in which people have been in long-term detention: the 19 men imprisoned in Eswatini and another six or seven in South Sudan. Some were convicted of assault and murder decades ago and had completed their sentences. Some were living in the United States legally; others were not. Many of the cases had additional complicating factors. Mosquera is caught in a diplomatic quagmire that began with Cuba’s 1959 revolution. Others come from countries without a functioning government or with no diplomatic ties to the country where they are being detained. None of the detainees I interviewed had been allowed to collect passports or any other documents that could serve as identification before they were deported.

The situation, in some respects, has come to resemble a more famous case in which the United States sent detainees abroad in haste: the detention center at Guantánamo Bay. In the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, hundreds of foreign nationals were kept out of the reach of American courts, spending years in prison without ever being charged.

Alma David, who now represents some of the other deportees in Eswatini in addition to Mosquera, compared the situation of the Eswatini detainees to a legal black hole. “It’s like you wake up, and you’re in this place, and there’s no way out,” David said. Once Mosquera was flown out of the United States, there were no options for challenging his detention in American courts, so David helped him find a local lawyer in Eswatini. (That lawyer was blocked from seeing Mosquera for nearly a year.) “People are disappearing into this no man’s land,” she said. “They have no connection to their new country, and they also apparently have no legal rights.”

Of the foreign prisons, the one in South Sudan is perhaps the most troubling. As of June, it had been months since anyone, even their lawyers, had heard from the people believed to be in detention there, men born in Laos, Vietnam, Cuba and Myanmar. The only person I found who was allowed to visit the prisoners was an American congressional aide who went last summer to Juba, the South Sudanese capital, to investigate detentions. Even so, the aide said, U.S. Embassy officials declined to accompany her to the prison. Now she is afraid for the fate of the detainees should South Sudan fall into another civil war.

The Eswatini government did not respond to a list of detailed questions I sent to the prime minister’s office about its arrangement with the United States. But my calls with Mosquera, who had obtained a phone with the help of a friendly prison guard, offered a view of a world where medicine was scarce, power outages were commonplace and food was purchased with money sent by relatives via Western Union to the prison warden.

Among those trapped with Mosquera was Kassim Saleh Wasil, arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Detroit more than a year ago. He arrived in the United States from Yemen in 1977 on an immigrant visa and became a permanent resident. He was convicted of second-degree murder in 1999, serving 20 years in prison. ICE said in a statement that he was one of “the many public safety threats and immigration violators that our officers work to take off the streets every day.”

When I met Wasil, who is now 71, over WhatsApp, I saw that he had lost weight in jail and appeared gaunt. “I thought I had paid my debt to society,” he said. He told me he has tried contacting diplomats from Yemen — which is ruled by dueling governments of civilians, soldiers and rebels — but he had not heard back. Wasil, who is Muslim, told me that his worst fear is that he will die forgotten in a Christian country where he will not receive a proper burial.

On another call, I reached Juan Carlos Font Agüero, another Cuban, who is 60 and has been held in Eswatini since last fall. Font told me he was released from a Florida prison in 2022 after serving a 17-year murder sentence, for killing someone during a fight. He showed me paperwork that he submitted during ICE detention, which showed that he had agreed to be deported to Mexico. He was sent to Eswatini instead, a country with no Cuban Embassy.

Font said he was ready to return to Cuba, and one of his daughters, still in Havana, has petitioned the Cuban government to allow his return. But so far there has been only silence. “I was kidnapped, pure and simple,” Font said of his deportation. “The only thing they didn’t do was put a blindfold on my face.”

In its statement, the Department of Homeland Security said the administration was “using every tool available to get criminal illegal aliens out of American communities and out of our country. Our message is clear: Criminals are not welcome in the United States.”

Mosquera arrived in America along with thousands of other Cubans, in Key West. His mother, Matilde del Peral, had been a political prisoner in Cuba, locked up for 18 months after she refused to attend meetings of the neighborhood Communist committee. Not long afterward, Fidel Castro, Cuba’s leader, declared that anyone who didn’t support his revolution was free to go, and President Jimmy Carter promised that the United States would welcome the refugees with “an open heart and open arms.” It was the beginning of an exodus of some 125,000 Cubans, including del Peral and all but one of her eight children.

The evacuation, however, was messy. Del Peral and her children initially were housed in a stadium, and like many of the other refugees, they left the matter of obtaining green cards for a later date as they struggled to start from scratch. Mosquera told me that while his mother fed the family and kept a roof over their heads, she didn’t understand that Miami was different from Havana, where the Castro government had all but eliminated petty crime. “Roberto was never a bad boy,” said his sister María Victoria de Ortíz, who lives in Miami. “It was the bad company that changed him, made him take another path.”

When Mosquera was about 14, he told me, another teenager started referring to their clique of friends as the Latin Kings. The name caught on, and Mosquera began to go by the nickname Power. At first, they were mostly playacting, Mosquera said, getting into fistfights and hiding from local beat cops they knew. But things changed when members of the real Latin Kings — a gang that began in the Puerto Rican community in Chicago — started to migrate to Miami. Suddenly, Mosquera found himself in the middle of a turf war, which began with tit-for-tat attacks between rivals before expanding into something much worse.

A raft of stabbings, shootings and car thefts ensued, with Mosquera and his friends often at the center of them. Mosquera told me that in 1988 he was ambushed at a fairground by rival gang members, who knocked his teeth out with a set of brass knuckles. (He still has rows of gold upper and lower teeth that flash as he speaks.) His gang decided to take revenge. One night in Coconut Grove, a neighborhood in Miami, they shot at a 16-year-old rival gangster, who survived the attack but was wounded in his leg.

Mosquera, who told me openly about many crimes he committed during his gang years, insisted he was not there that night. But fearing a life in prison if he stood trial, he took a plea deal for attempted first-degree murder and received a nine-year sentence. By 1996, Mosquera, then 26, had served his time. He thought he had a new life ahead of him, but as an undocumented immigrant, he was rearrested by immigration agents. Mosquera was caught in what is known as administrative detention — which, at the time, allowed immigrants to be held indefinitely before deportation. With Cuba still refusing to take deportees from the United States, Mosquera was held another six years, serving time in various prisons. A 2001 Supreme Court decision banned this practice, requiring the United States to release administrative detainees after six months if they cannot be deported.

It was during that time that the most brutal aspects of the American prison system came into focus for Mosquera. In 1996, he said, he and four other Cubans demanded a meeting with immigration authorities. Instead, he said, the guards assaulted them with pepper spray and tear gas. Later that night, he told me, a guard captain arrived with a group of subordinates, one of them wielding a metal pipe. Mosquera was beaten unconscious. As Mosquera and I talked, he lifted his right thumb, which is crooked. He hasn’t been able to move it since the attack, he said. (Human Rights Watch, which was alerted to the assault, reported that the men did not receive medical care for more than a week after the guards bludgeoned them.)

Mosquera was finally released in 2002 under an agreement that would allow him to remain in the United States and work, while maintaining regular check-ins with immigration authorities. Raised Catholic, he became a born-again Christian in prison. He also left his gang, even though others who tried to do so had been killed in retaliation, and started a family. As he spoke to me on a video call, he tilted his head back to show me the names of his daughters — Destiny, Faith, Monica and Cynthia — tattooed across his neck and chest.

But he still found his way into trouble. Around 2009, after being pulled over by a police officer while riding his motorcycle, he tried to flee, resulting in criminal charges and three years’ jail time. He told me that after his release, he was cited for two parole violations. But as time passed, he began to put all that behind him. In 2014, Mosquera took a temporary job at a Miami plumbing company.

He rose from apprentice to plumber and eventually to foreman; his former boss described him to me as a man who had turned his life around. “He wasn’t just a hard worker; he inspired the guys around him,” he said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he employs other immigrants who could be targeted by ICE for deportation.

Mosquera had never paid attention to politics. But by 2024, as Donald Trump again set his sights on the White House, Mosquera was undergoing a political awakening. He saw himself as one of the working-class Americans whom Trump — long popular in Miami’s Cuban American community — said he would defend. Mosquera often went to work with a hard hat emblazoned with a bald eagle, his former boss told me. Mosquera’s sister de Ortíz told me she remembered Mosquera practically stumping for Trump. “He would sit on the patio and say, ‘Trump is going to change everything, you’ll see,’” she said. “He even told his daughter to vote for Trump.”

Still, as Mosquera’s annual immigration date approached last summer, de Ortíz had a bad feeling. It was clear to her that the president’s nationalist message offered no exceptions, not even for the many Florida Cubans who supported him in two victories. “I told him, ‘Don’t go.’ And he told me, ‘No, sister, nothing is going to happen.’”

At the maximum-security prison in Eswatini, the deportees were ordered to strip so they could be examined. Mosquera knew similar treatment from his years in American prisons, but this time he was indignant: He had committed no crime, he thought. The guards ordered a 24-hour lockdown for the prisoners. No calls, no lawyers. Their food was a small piece of bread for breakfast and a bare-bones lunch and dinner; a small piece of chicken was served once a week.

After the Eswatini prisoners were barred from calling their families for a month, the warden brought a phone for the prisoners to use. Mosquera called his sister in Miami. “We’d been looking for him everywhere, and then he tells us he’s in Africa,” she said. With the help of his niece, Mosquera made contact with David. “I could see he was somebody who spent enough time in the U.S. criminal justice system to have a concept of what his rights were, and there was a process that had to be followed,” David said. “He was like, You just can’t do this to me.”

One morning, according to Mosquera, an Eswatini general visited the prison and, along with the warden, demanded that the men all sign papers that the government had prepared saying they had declined legal counsel. The prisoners refused. At one point, the guards began to blast Christian music through loudspeakers and eventually demanded that the men, including Wasil, the Yemeni Muslim, stand outside in the yard and pray as the music played.

Mosquera reached a breaking point in October, he said, when a flight carrying 10 deportees arrived. People were coming in faster than they were going, and he had no answers about what would come next. “I said, ‘Lord, what is the way out?’” he told me. Mosquera told the guards he would not eat until he could see a lawyer and was told why he was being held.

At first, the prison guards ignored Mosquera, treating his hunger strike as a joke. At one point, Eswatini officials claimed in a statement that he was on a voluntary religious fast. As the weeks passed, the effects of the hunger strike became agonizing for Mosquera. He recorded his condition in a handwritten diary. “The kidney pains began, my arms and right foot began to fall asleep,” he wrote on Day 22. “In my body I have a headache and am very tired, a lot of dizziness.”

Mosquera sent me photos of his diary, and as I scrolled through the pages, I could see that he had spent much of the hunger strike writing about his 10-year-old daughter, Faith, whom he last saw a week before he was deported. (Mosquera and the girl’s mother are divorced.) “I miss Faith so much. When we would go buy you little clothes, we’d go eat at the mall that you liked so much, we’d go to the movies,” he wrote. “I felt like the happiest father in the world seeing you happy.”

After Mosquera had gone nearly a month without food, his lawyer, David, reached him through one of the prison guards’ phones, urging him to stop the fast. She said he needed to be strong if they were going to fight, Mosquera told me. Mosquera relented; the only other option was to starve himself to death, he said.

After he ended the hunger strike, the guards allowed him to purchase his own cellphone, using money he had been sent by relatives. It was a small victory, but far from the one he sought.

Only two deportees have managed to return to their countries of origin since arriving in Eswatini. One of them, Orville Etoria, the Jamaican man who was on Mosquera’s flight, was repatriated last year. Etoria, who had been a legal resident in the United States since age 12, had his green card revoked by an immigration judge who ordered him deported in 2009, while he was serving a 25-year sentence for a 1996 murder. After his release in 2021, immigration officials instead allowed him to stay in the United States, provided he made regular check-ins. It remains unclear why he was sent to Eswatini; the Jamaican government says it had not blocked his return, as the Trump administration asserted.

When I called him in the town where he had settled, he told me that being deported at age 62 left him feeling disillusioned by the place that once adopted him. “This administration went for people who had changed because they want to prove a point — that you could never change in their mind,” he said.

When I asked Mosquera to imagine some kind of life back in Cuba, what he conjured was grim. “I’m a loudmouth, as you can see when we speak,” he said. “If I was sent to Cuba, probably they’d lock me up too, just like they did to my mother.”

As we continued to send messages week after week, he told me about the end of his marriage, which came about after years of acrimony. His divorce was made official three days before he was deported, but he had always been close to his children, especially Faith. Now he had stopped calling even her. “I need to get the hell out of here,” he texted me one morning. “My life is passing.”

I asked Mosquera why he hadn’t talked to his daughter. He paused for a minute and then started telling me about the day of his ICE arrest. A judge granted him joint custody of Faith, and they were about to spend their first week together, he said. She was home waiting for Mosquera when he was detained. “And now she asks me, ‘When are you coming home?’ It is the greatest pain I ever had — I’ve cried like a child,” he told me. “I, who have been stabbed and shot, I never cried. If I let myself think of her, I will break.”

One day Mosquera mentioned that he had begun a long-distance relationship with a woman. I asked if I could speak to this new girlfriend, and he sent me a South Florida number with the name Ivy Mercado. When I called Mercado, who works for a health care company from her home in Jupiter, Fla., she told me that she met Mosquera in the 1980s when he was dating a friend of hers. They had fallen out of touch, but when word spread that Mosquera had disappeared into ICE custody, she said, “I cried like a baby, and I couldn’t understand why was this affecting me so hard.” A mutual friend sent her Mosquera’s phone number, and they had a long conversation late last year. Mercado called again. She soon realized she was in love.

If there was one thing that seemed to be sustaining Mosquera during his detention, it was his relationship with Mercado. Sometimes Mosquera would talk nostalgically with her about 1980s Miami. Mercado would often tell him about legal research she had done on his case. As we talked, Mercado told me that she was well aware that Mosquera’s imprisonment, which brought them together, is also the thing that keeps them apart. “I tell him: ‘It’s God’s orchestration. You know, we have to believe that,’” she said. “And he’ll say: ‘Well, it brought you to me. It brought us to each other.’”

One morning in July, my phone buzzed. I could see Mosquera had sent me several shaky videos he had just filmed from the prison courtyard. In one, there was a convoy of four vehicles, including what looked like a military truck, entering the grounds. In another, 11 people filed past, some wearing white uniforms. One of them raised his fist in a gesture of resistance. A new group of prisoners had arrived, the third since Mosquera’s flight last year. “No cubanos,” he wrote to me. “One Belize. One Jamaica 🇯🇲 the rest from Africa.”

A video taken by Mosquera from the prison courtyard showing a new group of prisoners arriving.Roberto Mosquera

I called Mosquera, and he began handing the phone to the new arrivals. They looked nervous on the video call. Like Mosquera, they said they had not heard of Eswatini before they arrived. All of them said they had criminal records — some for violent crimes — that had led to their deportations, but they had not expected to be sent to this corner of Africa. Several of them told me they were under protective judicial orders that barred them from being returned to their home countries, where they would be at risk of persecution. They now feared Eswatini would simply forward them to the places they had fled.

One of them, a 64-year-old pastor from Jamaica, named Junior Alves, told me a judge had barred him from being deported to his country because of threats to his family. He said he first came to the United States in 1982. He was arrested on various drug charges when he was a young man, he said, but he had since turned his life around.

Alves handed the phone back to Mosquera. Until now, it had been months since the United States sent new deportees to the prison, but Mosquera was sure there would be more — the guards had been clearing more space, giving everyone new bars of soap.

Now Mosquera had work to do. He needed to show the new arrivals how to get money sent from home. Where they would wash their clothes. What to do when the power went out.

But what everyone really wanted to know was how long Mosquera had been in Eswatini.

“I tell them a year,” he said. “And they get sick to their stomach.”


Nicholas Casey is a staff writer for the magazine based in Madrid.

Read by Ron Butler

Narration produced by Tanya Pérez

Engineered by Sharon Kearney

Nicholas Casey is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine. He has spent a decade as a foreign correspondent in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East and wrote about national politics during the 2020 U.S. presidential campaign.“

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Less than 24 hours after being sworn in, AG Blanche is already proving his loyalty to Trump

 

The REAL Reason Latino Voters Are Leaving Trump


The REAL Reason Latino Voters Are Leaving Trump

Rabbis Plead With Mamdani to Tone Down His Anti-Israel Messaging - The New York Times

Rabbis Plead With Mamdani to Tone Down His Anti-Israel Messaging

"In a private meeting at City Hall, an invited group of rabbis told Mayor Zohran Mamdani that his relationship with Jewish New Yorkers needed to change.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani, wearing a suit and tie, speaks at a lectern with an American flag behind him.
Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s relationship with large swaths of the Jewish community in New York City has been rocky.Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

A group of rabbis beseeched Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Monday to pay greater attention to the effect of his rhetoric about Israel on the safety of New York City Jews during a private meeting at City Hall.

During the hourlong meeting, convened by the Mayor’s Office to Combat Antisemitism, the group of 10 rabbis tried to convey to the mayor how they thought his public statements had reverberated in a city where anti-Jewish hate crimes were on the rise.

There was a mix of opinions in the room, according to Rabbi Rachel Timoner of Congregation Beth Elohim in Brooklyn, with some of the Jewish leaders urging the mayor to soften his rhetoric, and some saying they would like him to stop criticizing Israel and instead focus on local issues.

Others said they supported his right to criticize Israel and its leadership, but asked that he do so with more nuance. At least one rabbi suggested that the mayor could more consistently condemn Hamas and emphasize that American Jews are not responsible for the actions of the Israeli government.

“I’m happy to work in partnership with your administration, but Mr. Mayor, you are 90 percent of what could be different here,” Rabbi Rick Jacobs, the head of the Reform movement in North America, recalled saying in the meeting. “If instead of vilifying Israel, you spoke constructively, in measured tones — that would move the needle more than anything else, and I’m hopeful you’ll use that power.”

Despite the wide spectrum of views in the room, there was a uniform sense that something about Mr. Mamdani’s relationship with the Jewish community had to change, according to one of the invited rabbis who asked for anonymity to speak candidly about private discussions.

During his brief mayoralty, Mr. Mamdani’s relationship with large swaths of the Jewish community in New York City has been rocky.

“There was no tiptoeing around the elephant in the room,” said Rabbi Jonathan Leener, the leader of the Prospect Heights Shul, a liberal modern Orthodox synagogue in Brooklyn.

“The mayor’s comments have ramifications and he needs to be aware of how in the current climate, that just adds to the temperature and creates an environment that I think a lot of Jews feel vulnerable in,” Rabbi Leener said.

While many New York Jews oppose Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, Mr. Mamdani’s recent presidential-style address denouncing Mr. Netanyahu as a “war criminal” — and ultimately acknowledging that the law bars the mayor from fulfilling a campaign promise to arrest him — caused some Jews to worry that Mr. Mamdani risked inflaming antisemitism in the city.

“If he is going to criticize Israel or speak for Palestinian freedom, which I do regularly, then it really matters that there is complexity in his message,” said Rabbi Timoner, whose congregation includes Senator Chuck Schumer. “We can’t vote there, we don’t have any ability to change what’s happening, yet people are profiling us and spewing hate at us because they’re angry at the Israeli government.”

In the meeting, Rabbi Timoner shared this message, emphasizing that she felt that Mr. Mamdani had spoken movingly about Islamophobia after Sept. 11 in New York, and could bring that same clarity to talking about the threats against the American Jewish community today.

Monday’s meeting included Reform, Conservative and modern Orthodox rabbis. Several rabbis described the meeting as candid and respectful. One of the rabbis recalled that Mr. Mamdani had expressed gratitude for the candor and said he was taking what he had heard to heart.

“It was an open, positive and constructive conversation,” Phylisa Wisdom, executive director of the Mayor’s Office to Combat Antisemitism, said in a statement. “Mayor Mamdani has and will continue to engage with Jewish life in New York City in order to meet the needs of our communities and reaffirm his commitment to the thriving of Jewish communities across the five boroughs.”

Mr. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, is New York City’s first Muslim mayor, and he came of political age in the pro-Palestinian movement. As a student at Bowdoin College in Maine, Mr. Mamdani founded a chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine and led a failed campaign to persuade the school to take part in an academic boycott of Israel.

As mayor of the most Jewish city in the world outside of Israel, Mr. Mamdani has stayed true to his stance on the matter, even as he has moderated in other areas.

Rabbi Leener, a self-described Zionist with family in Israel, said his goal in attending the meeting was not to change Mr. Mamdani’s well-established views on the conflict, but rather to encourage him to create a safer environment for his Jewish constituents. He also urged the mayor to devote more police resources to protecting synagogues and other Jewish institutions.

“That should be his focus and not making comments unnecessarily about the conflict,” Rabbi Leener said. “Or having a bit more nuance around it. That it’s not just good versus evil.”

Emma Goldberg is a Times reporter who writes about New York City and the Mamdani administration."

Rabbis Plead With Mamdani to Tone Down His Anti-Israel Messaging - The New York Times

Saturday, August 08, 2026

Blanche Is Confirmed as Attorney General After Overcoming G.O.P. Concerns

 

Blanche Is Confirmed as Attorney General After Overcoming G.O.P. Concerns

“Todd Blanche, who has served as acting attorney general since April, eked out Senate approval, despite growing unease about his willingness to rein in President Trump.

Blanche, in an orange tie and dark suit, sits behind a microphone.
Todd Blanche, President Trump’s nominee for attorney general, at a Senate committee hearing last month.Kenny Holston/The New York Times

A bitterly divided Senate narrowly confirmed Todd Blanche as attorney general on Saturday, elevating President Trump’s former defense lawyer who has presided over a Justice Department that has ceded much of its independence to the White House.

Mr. Blanche — the No. 2 official at the department who has served as acting attorney general since his predecessor, Pam Bondi, was fired in April — was confirmed after a bruising battle that centered on concerns about his ability and willingness to rein in Mr. Trump. But as they have time and again during Mr. Trump’s second term, Republicans ultimately swallowed their reservations and fell in line behind the president’s wishes.

The vote was 50 to 49, with two Republicans, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joining all the chamber’s Democrats in opposing the nomination. Both of them said they had fears that the Justice Department had become increasingly political and that Mr. Blanche would do little to stop any further erosion of its independence from Mr. Trump.

Their dissent briefly cast Mr. Blanche’s nomination in doubt given Republicans’ narrow Senate majority. But a third skeptical Republican, Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, threw his support to Mr. Blanche on Friday, effectively salvaging his bid.

“The choice is not between perfection and Mr. Blanche,” Mr. Cassidy, who lost his re-election bid to a Trump-backed primary challenger this year, said in a speech on the Senate floor. “It is between Mr. Blanche and another acting attorney general, who may not run the department effectively under President Trump.”

Ms. Murkowski said that she had reached the opposite conclusion.

“The country needs an attorney general who will check the worst impulses of this administration,” she said in a statement. “I hope Mr. Blanche is able to achieve that if confirmed, but I simply do not have confidence that will be the case.”

Mr. Blanche, who, on social media, thanked the Senate for staying late, faced a rocky path to confirmation that centered largely on his involvement in an agreement he brokered to settle Mr. Trump’s lawsuit against the I.R.S. The deal included lucrative tax immunity protections for the president and his family, and the creation of a $1.8 billion federal fund Mr. Trump has championed to pay people who claimed they had been victims of government persecution, potentially including those charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Those issues came to encapsulate broader concerns over the direction of the Justice Department in the Trump era. Critics and former officials have said that Mr. Blanche, far from being a moderating force, has demolished safeguards that once ensured departmental independence in leadership roles.

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, criticized the confirmation as enabling corruption. “Senate Democrats will continue fighting against the Trump administration’s assault on the rule of law and undermining of democratic values,” he posted on social media.

Republican senators were particularly dismayed over the creation of the $1.8 billion fund, and both Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski cited Mr. Blanche’s involvement as a reason for opposing his confirmation. They also took issue with the immunity from tax audits given to Mr. Trump, two of his sons, and his businesses in the resolution of the I.R.S. lawsuit.

“Mr. Blanche approved an order to shield the president, his sons, and the family business from I.R.S. audits, protections unavailable to other American taxpayers,” Ms. Collins, who is running for re-election in a state that Mr. Trump lost in 2024, said in a statement this week.

Mr. Trump had urged Senate Republicans to swiftly confirm Mr. Blanche. But he had also suggested that he would rather postpone the nomination and leave him as acting attorney general indefinitely than give up the immunity protections or commit to killing what he called the “anti-weaponization” fund, which as recently as this week he said he wanted to revive.

The issue has dogged Mr. Blanche for weeks. The Judiciary Committee delayed advancing his nomination to the full Senate last week after two Republican senators, John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, raised questions about the $1.8 billion fund, which Mr. Blanche had said would not move ahead, and the extraordinary immunity from tax audits given to Mr. Trump and his businesses in his resolution of the I.R.S. lawsuit.

After days of negotiation, Mr. Blanche on Sunday night provided written assurances that the fund was dead and that the immunity for the president would be narrowed, and Mr. Cornyn and Mr. Tillis dropped their objections.

But while Mr. Cornyn and Mr. Tillis focused their demands on the terms of the settlement, both Ms. Murkowski and Ms. Collins made a much broader case that Mr. Blanche’s participation in the plan’s creation was itself disqualifying.

Ms. Murkowski said that she also worried that Mr. Blanche’s commitments could be undone and the fund could too easily be restored after his confirmation, a concern shared by many critics.

“I am also keenly aware that the department’s nearly $2 billion dollar slush fund — which likely would have rewarded Jan. 6 protesters — is only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage,” she said. “Once we vote, that will end, and there is no telling what the future holds.”

She also cited the department’s handling of the release of the Epstein files, which Mr. Blanche oversaw. Both Ms. Murkowski and Ms. Collins, who are supporters of abortion rights, referenced Mr. Blanche’s telling anti-abortion groups that he would take a hard line in enforcing the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

In his speech on Friday, Mr. Cassidy criticized Mr. Blanche’s involvement in negotiating the fund and the audit protections, calling it “poor judgment.”

But he said that discussions with Mr. Blanche led him to believe that the acting attorney general viewed those decisions as mistakes.

Mr. Cassidy said that he had been influenced in part by Mr. Trump’s threat to keep Mr. Blanche as the acting attorney general indefinitely, effectively ignoring any resistance from Congress. The senator said he believed a Senate confirmation vote would give Mr. Blanche “greater leverage to push for things that should be pushed for” than he would have if he continued in an acting capacity.

He cited Mr. Blanche’s support from William P. Barr, who served as attorney general during Mr. Trump’s first term but resigned rather than promote or investigate the president’s lies about the 2020 election.

Mr. Barr, who has established himself as an informal adviser to Mr. Blanche, has argued in private meetings with senators that Mr. Blanche has the temperament, access and approach to quietly mitigate the president’s demands. Mr. Barr’s own efforts to counter Mr. Trump were intermittent and had mixed results.

Mr. Cassidy, who has become more openly critical of the president since his election defeat in May, said his views about Mr. Trump did not factor into his decision about Mr. Blanche.

“I have a history with Mr. Trump,” he said, “but that history does not matter one bit.”

The Louisiana Republican, a doctor who leads the health committee, faced significant outcry last year after backing Mr. Trump’s choice of a vaccine skeptic, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to be the health secretary, after securing promises from Mr. Kennedy that were later broken. That decision may have cost him support with moderate voters in his failed primary campaign.

On Friday, he appeared to grow emotional as he announced his decision on Mr. Blanche.

“I’ll be criticized for this vote,” Mr. Cassidy said. “What’s new?”

Then he paused to collect himself, his voice growing shaky as he said his constituents could be “assured that I worked hard to understand the issue and to make the right decision.”

Hours later, Ms. Murkowski said that she respected Mr. Cassidy’s decision, knowing “how much time and thought” he had put into it.

“We both have to live with our choices, live with our votes, and trust that we have done the best job that we can,” she said.

Michael Gold covers Congress for The Times, with a focus on immigration policy and congressional oversight.

Glenn Thrush covers the Department of Justice for The Times and has also written about gun violence, civil rights and conditions in the country’s jails and prisons.

Carl Hulse is the chief Washington correspondent for The Times, primarily writing about Congress and national political races and issues. He has nearly four decades of experience reporting in the nation’s capital.“