Criminal Justice And Human Rights Law Blog
I publish an "Editorial and Opinion Blog", Editorial and Opinion. My News Blog is @ News . I have a Jazz Blog @ Jazz and a Technology Blog @ Technology. My domain is Armwood.Com @ Armwood.Com.
What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White
Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.
This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.
Thursday, June 12, 2025
Inside a Courthouse, Chaos and Tears as Trump Accelerates Deportations - The New York Times
Inside a Courthouse, Chaos and Tears as Trump Accelerates Deportations
"Immigration courtrooms in New York City have emerged as a flashpoint, with masked agents making surprise arrests of immigrants who have appeared for routine hearings and check-ins.

Inside an immigration courthouse in the heart of Lower Manhattan, federal agents in T-shirts and caps cover their faces with masks as they discreetly attend routine hearings filled with immigrants.
The agents tip off other officers huddled in the court’s staid hallways as undocumented immigrants on their radar leave the hearings. They then move in to arrest their targets, sometimes leading to disorderly scenes as husbands are separated from wives, and parents from children.
The scene unfolding in New York City has repeated itself in immigration courthouses across the nation, a window into the Trump administration’s accelerating crackdown amid pressure from the White House to ramp up deportations. In Los Angeles, workplace raids have inflamed tensions and led to demonstrations. In New York, the courthouse arrests have emerged as a defining flashpoint.
In June, hundreds came and went at one federal building — for asylum hearings, citizenship applications and mandated check-ins with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. Some left in handcuffs.
Immigrants arrested after appearing in courtrooms on higher floors were ferried by agents to holding cells on the 10th floor, an off-limits area where ICE typically keeps a few people for several hours as they are processed and transferred elsewhere.
But ICE agents have apprehended so many people showing up for routine appointments this month that the facilities appear to be overcrowded. Hundreds of migrants have slept on the floor or sitting upright, sometimes for days, said Francisco Castillo, a Dominican immigrant who was held there for three days last week.
Mr. Castillo, 36, said that the four holding cells — two for men, two for women — were so packed that some of the nearly 100 migrants in his cell resorted to sleeping on the bathroom floors. They were held for days without showers or clothing changes.
“Every single one of us slept on the floor because there are no beds,” Mr. Castillo said in a phone interview in Spanish from a detention facility in New Jersey where he was transferred. “What’s human about this?”
Mr. Castillo’s account echoed concerns from two Democratic members of Congress who showed up at the building at 26 Federal Plaza on Sunday to inspect the 10th floor after hearing reports of overcrowding and unsanitary conditions. They were denied access by ICE.
The imposing federal building at 26 Federal Plaza — home to an ICE headquarters and one of the city’s three immigration courts — has become a centerpiece of immigration enforcement in New York. ICE agents have arrested dozens of migrants in and around the building, as well as the other two courts in Manhattan, and held them out of view at 26 Federal Plaza before transferring them to detention centers outside the city.
The arrests have drawn protesters to the building’s perimeter, leading the police to arrest several who have tried to block vans carrying migrants out of the building. Inside, the presence of agents in courtrooms that were long considered off-limits to ICE has quickly disrupted courthouse operations and, critics say, eroded their status as a safe space for immigrants to engage with the legal system.
The sight of masked ICE agents in hallways has unsettled the hundreds of immigrants who show up at 26 Federal Plaza each day. There are signs that the arrests may be dissuading some migrants from following the rules by showing up to mandated court dates, worsening their chances of staying in the United States, because missed hearings can lead to deportation.
On Monday morning, 17 of the roughly two dozen immigrants who were required to show up before a judge on the 12th floor of 26 Federal Plaza never appeared — a higher number of no-shows than is usual, immigration lawyers said.
An Ecuadorean family of four living in New Jersey was the first to line up outside the courtroom. The parents clutched paperwork to their chests as they whispered and anxiously eyed the masked agents by the elevators.
“We’re uneasy,” said the mother, Joselyn Titisunta Saavedra, describing the gang threats that they said forced the family to seek asylum in the United States.
Federal officials have said that the court arrests allow agents to detain people in a controlled environment without having to dispatch teams into communities, which takes more time and planning and puts officers and the public at risk. The Department of Homeland Security, the parent agency of ICE, has also said that threats against its officers are up, justifying the use of masks to conceal their identities.
Homeland Security and ICE did not respond to repeated requests for comment about the courthouse arrests and the conditions at 26 Federal Plaza. Top Homeland Security officials have previously cast the arrests as a way to quickly remove some of the millions of migrants who crossed the border during the Biden era.
Mr. Castillo, the man detained for three days, entered the United States illegally in 2022 from the Dominican Republic and does not have a criminal record, his lawyers said. ICE agents arrested Mr. Castillo, who is married to a U.S.-born citizen and lives in the Bronx, when he appeared on June 4 for a routine immigration court hearing in Manhattan.
“Emotionally, I’m frustrated because I was doing what they supposedly wanted to me to do” by showing up to court, Mr. Castillo said.
ICE moved to place him in deportation proceedings that moved on a fast track, a tactic that the agency has deployed to swiftly expel migrants without hearings. The agency has also expanded the arrest of immigrants showing up for other immigration-related appointments, not just court hearings.
Last week, a number of immigrants, including families with children, received automated text messages asking them to report to a nondescript office across the street from 26 Federal Plaza to check in with ICE. They were undocumented immigrants in supervisory programs that allow them to live in communities while their cases wind through the courts, so long as they occasionally check in with ICE.
When they showed up to check in last week, many were surprised with handcuffs. Dozens of immigrants were arrested in broad daylight on the streets of Manhattan as protesters hurled insults at agents, calling them “pigs” and “Nazis.”
Last Wednesday, Ambar Mujica Rodriguez, 33, and her 12-year-old daughter sobbed and screamed as four agents escorted her husband, Jaen Mawer Enciso Guzman, 30, to an SUV. Their daughter ran after him and tried to hug him. The Venezuelan family crossed the border into the United States in 2023 and had a pending asylum application, according to their lawyer, Margaret Cargioli.
“What’s alarming here and at immigration court is that they’re picking up people who are complying,” Ms. Cargioli said. “He was very cooperative with all the requirements that were made of him, and it’s a real shame that they’re separating them.”
She said he was probably targeted because he had entered the country about two years ago. The Trump administration has begun placing immigrants who have been in the country for less than two years into a deportation process known as expedited removal proceedings, which were previously used only for migrants encountered near the border.
Immigration courts are different from criminal courts. People are typically summoned to immigration courts because the federal government has initiated deportation hearings against them for entering the country illegally, not to face accusations of committing other crimes.
The arrests, in and near courts where millions of foreign-born individuals nationwide showed up last year so that judges could determine whether they could stay in the country, have turned the once unexceptional government offices into a daily political spectacle.
Brad Lander, the city comptroller and a candidate for mayor, sat in on several hearings at a different immigration court, at 290 Broadway last week, and escorted out migrant families who seemed to be at risk for arrest. On Sunday, the two members of Congress, Representatives Adriano Espaillat and Nydia Velázquez, were denied entry to tour the 10th floor at 26 Federal Plaza.
Inside the city’s three immigration courthouses — at 26 Federal Plaza and 290 Broadway, just a few blocks from City Hall, and at 201 Varick Street, on the West Side — the atmosphere has grown tense.
Fliers in Spanish and English encouraging self-deportation await arriving families. ICE agents and activists, some of whom also wear masks, occasionally taunt each other. Immigration judges and court staff express consternation over the disruption that the arrests — and the media attention — has wrought on typically sleepy immigration proceedings.
On Friday, one such arrest turned chaotic after ICE executed the administration’s new playbook. Inside a courtroom at 26 Federal Plaza, ICE prosecutors asked a judge to dismiss the immigration case against a Dominican man, a legal maneuver to allow ICE agents in the hallway to detain him and place him in expedited deportation proceedings.
The man, Joaquin Rosario Espinal, like many, showed up without a lawyer and expressed confusion when the government asked that his case be dismissed.
“What do you mean, dismiss my case?” Mr. Rosario Espinal, 34, asked in Spanish. “Do I need to leave the country, or not?”
The judge tried to explain. An immigration lawyer in the chambers sought to intervene on his behalf, to no avail. News photographers gathered in the hallway to capture the imminent arrest, leading the judge to admonish them for being a distraction.
“I wish you the best of luck,” the judge told Mr. Rosario Espinal.
When he exited into a cramped hallway, at least six agents tackled him to the floor as they also grappled with activists.
“Stop resisting!” one agent shouted as Mr. Rosario Espinal, who an acquaintance said arrived in the United States last year, was arrested. He was eventually whisked away to a detention facility north of the city in Orange County, N.Y.
In the lobby of the building, which also houses offices of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, a family of three from Gambia emerged from the elevators dressed in colorful dresses, smiling and holding American flags.
They had just become American citizens.
Olivia Bensimon and Wesley Parnell contributed reporting.
Luis Ferré-Sadurnà is a Times reporter covering immigration, focused on the influx of migrants arriving in the New York region."
Wednesday, June 11, 2025
Federal appeals court wrestles with Trump effort to fight hush money conviction
Federal appeals court wrestles with Trump effort to fight hush money conviction

“A federal appeals court in New York wrangled Wednesday with President Donald Trump’s claim that his hush money conviction should be reviewed by federal courts and seemed open to the idea that the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity decision may weigh in the president’s favor.
“It seems to me that we got a very big case that created a whole new world of presidential immunity,” US Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez, who was nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden, said at one point during oral arguments. “The boundaries are not clear at this point.”
At issue is whether Trump can move his state court case on 34 counts of falsifying business records to federal court, where he hopes to argue that prosecutors violated the Supreme Court’s immunity decision last year by using certain evidence against him, including testimony from former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks.
“The scope of a federal constitutional immunity for the president of the United States should be decided by this court and the Supreme Court, not by New York state courts,” said Jeffrey Wall, a former acting US solicitor general who is representing Trump in the case. “Everything about this cries out for federal court.”
The Supreme Court’s decision last year granted Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for his official acts and barred prosecutors from attempting to enter evidence about them, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president’s private conduct.
Without that prohibition on evidence, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could “eviscerate the immunity” the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president’s official acts.
And so, the underlying question is whether prosecutors crossed that line by including the testimony from Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout, as well as a series of social media posts Trump authored during his first term criticizing the hush money case.
The three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, all appointed by Democratic presidents, asked probing questions of both sides and it wasn’t clear after more than an hour of arguments how they would decide the case. The judges pressed the attorney representing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on why the Supreme Court’s decision last year didn’t preclude the evidence at issue in the case.
“The Supreme Court used very broad language in talking about evidentiary immunity,” noted Circuit Judge Susan Carney.
Bragg’s office has countered that it’s too late for federal courts to intervene. That’s because Trump was already convicted and sentenced. Prosecutors have also argued that the evidence at issue wasn’t the kind the Supreme Court was referring to. Hicks may have been a White House official when she testified, they said, but she was speaking about actions Trump took in a private capacity.
“The fact that we are now past the point of sentencing would be a compelling reason to find no ‘good cause’ for removal,” said Steven Wu, who was representing Bragg.
Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don’t attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed “under color” of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job.
Wu analogized Trump’s argument to a postal worker who commits a crime on the weekend and then confesses to his boss at work on Monday. The confession, even though it happened in a post office, doesn’t suddenly convert the content of the conversation to an official US Postal Service action.
“The criminal charges were private and unofficial conduct,” Wu said.
Trump was ultimately sentenced in January without penalty.
He had been accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.)
US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, denied Trump’s request to move the case to federal court – keeping his appeals instead in New York courts. Trump, who frequently complained about the New York trial court judge in his case, Juan Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an “unbiased federal forum.”
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Israeli troops kill at least 17 in Gaza, say local officials, as Greta Thunberg deported | Gaza | The Guardian
Israeli troops kill at least 17 in Gaza, say local officials, as Greta Thunberg deported
"Palestinians reportedly killed while trying to reach food sites, after Madleen aid yacht crew taken into custody

Israeli troops killed at least 17 Palestinians trying to reach food distribution sites on Tuesday morning, local health authorities in Gaza said, as Israeli authorities deported Greta Thunberg and at least three other activists who had attempted to sail to the territory with aid.
The Madleen yacht was seized by Israeli authorities on Monday and towed to the port of Ashdod, where the 12 crew members, who also included the French MEP Rima Hassan, were taken into police custody. Some are still in Israel, where they will face deportation hearings.
The ship was attempting to bring a symbolic shipment of aid to Gaza, which faces a looming famine after more than 11 weeks of total siege and ongoing severe restrictions on food entering the territory.
Israel has attempted to shift most food distribution away from humanitarian organisations including UN agencies to a secretive US- and Israel-backed logistics startup that has never worked in a conflict zone at scale.
Dozens of people have been killed as they tried to collect food from the handful of sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which are secured by armed guards and under the protection of the Israeli military.
The latest deaths came early on Tuesday morning when Israeli gunfire killed at least 17 people and injured dozens more as they approached a site in central Gaza, health authorities in the territory said.
The GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Israeli military said it was aware of reports of injuries after it fired warning shots towards “suspects” in the Wadi Gaza area whom its troops deemed a threat. “The warning shots were fired hundreds of meters from the aid distribution site, prior to its opening hours,” a spokesperson said. The military said the numbers released by local health authorities did not align with the information they had collected.
Israel has been under heavy international pressure over hunger in Gaza, with the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, announcing that he had lifted the siege after warnings from longstanding friends of Israel that the “starvation crisis” there was damaging Israel’s international standing.
In an apparent response to the huge amount of publicity generated by the Madleen even before it set sail, Israel’s foreign ministry on Monday attacked the crew as “celebrities” on a “selfie yacht”.
After Israeli forces took control of the boat, it posted an image of Thunberg being offered food and claimed she was “in good spirits” while she was held incommunicado.
In a video prepared before the boat was intercepted Thunberg said that if she lost communication supporters should assume she had been kidnapped and advocate for her release.
The boat arrived in the port city of Ashdod after dark fell, where its crew were given a choice between consenting to deportation or staying in police custody and facing a tribunal.
All rejected the claim that they had entered Israel illegally, because Israeli forces seized the boat in international waters then brought them to an Israeli port by force. Some chose to sign strategically, so they could leave and advocate for the others when they are brought to court.
Israel’s foreign ministry shared pictures of Thunberg boarding a morning flight to France, and said the other crew members were being held at Ben Gurion airport.
Although they were never expected to reach Gaza, whose shores are guarded by Israel’s navy, the ship intensified international focus on hunger in Gaza.
The UN has been able to bring only limited supplies of flour into Gaza since Israel lifted a total siege three weeks ago, and most of that had been taken by starving Palestinians or looted by armed gangs before the UN could distribute it, the deputy UN spokesperson Farhan Haq said on Monday.
The UN has been allowed to transport 4,600 metric tonnes of wheat flour into Gaza for the last three weeks. If shared equally that would provide about one week’s supply of bread to the roughly 2.3 million people living in Gaza, under WFP guidelines, but it would need to be eaten with other food to meet minimum daily calorie needs.
Haq said aid groups in Gaza estimated that between 8,000 and 10,000 tonnes of wheat flour were needed to give each family in Gaza a bag and ease desperation."