Contact Me By Email

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.

This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.

Friday, June 14, 2024

Neil Gorsuch Slams Supreme Court Ruling: 'Trash Heap'

Neil Gorsuch Slams Supreme Court Ruling: 'Trash Heap'

“Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch wants the Supreme Court to correct its "trash heap" ruling in a bankruptcy case.

On Friday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC.

The case centered on a 2017 law that increased quarterly fees large companies paid to fund the U.S. Trustee. However, North Carolina and Alabama, not part of the U.S. Trustee program, did not impose a matching fee increase in their bankruptcy courses, leading to a disparity in how much companies paid, according to Reuters. In 2022, the court found that the increase was unconstitutional.

In this case, the court heard arguments about whether refunds should be issued to fix this previous constitutional violation. The majority of the court's justices ruled that prospective parity, rather than refunds, would be the proper remedy.

Newsweek reached out to the Supreme Court's public information office for comment via email.

"Respondents, a group of Chapter 11 debtors, argue that they are entitled to a refund. But, as respondents forthrightly concede, adopting their preferred remedy would require us to undercut congressional intent and transform, by judicial fiat, a program that Congress designed to be self-funding into an estimated $326 million bill for taxpayers," the majority opinion, authored by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, reads.

Your Morning Starts Here

Begin your day with a curated outlook of top news around the world and why it matters.

The case divided the conservatives on the court. Justices John RobertsSamuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh joined the liberal justices in the majority opinion, while Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrettdissented.

Neil Gorsuch slams Supreme Court ruling
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch poses for an official portrait in Washington, D.C. on October 7, 2022. Gorsuch slammed the Court’s ruling in a bankruptcy case on Friday. Alex Wong/Getty Images

Gorsuch, who wrote the dissenting opinion, offered a scathing rebuke of the majority in the case, suggesting they believe the value of a constitutional wrong is "not much." He argued that the constitutional violations brought forth in the case should be refunded.

"Two years ago, we held that this geographically discriminatory treatment violated the Constitution's Bankruptcy Clause— a provision that, we stressed, was not 'toothless,'" he wrote. "Today, however, the Court performs a remedial root canal, permitting the government to keep the cash it extracted from its unconstitutional fee regime."

He slammed the majority for allegedly refusing "to recognize what remedy our cases call for when that kind of past wrong is established," referring to "damages."

In a footnote to his dissent, Gorsuch blasted the majority opinion in the case, calling the ruling a "remedial trash heap."

"Still, if the majority wishes to rest its holding today on the lack of party presentation of these arguments, I will not stand in its way, for it means debtors who have more forcefully pressed the arguments the majority overlooks need not join Hammons on the remedial trash-heap. Courts below remain free to consider those arguments," he wrote.

He urged the court to change course, questioning "what that kind of thinking could mean for those seeking retrospective relief for other constitutional violations."

"The rest of us can only hope that the Court corrects its mistake before it metastasizes too far beyond the bankruptcy context," he wrote.“

No comments:

Post a Comment