She is hardly wonderful. She is grandstanding. Her questions showed no personal understanding of the situations she was describing - she could barely read the text scripted for her by her staff. And her specific questions were asked in a way that they were clearly designed to elicit responses that could only be used against both Abrams and any administration he served or serves. (Granted, he could have offered better responses [we support democratically elected governments; we do not condone acts of genocide or other human rights violations by anyone, friend or foe], but it is no surprise he was hostile after her setup.)
She is hardly wonderful. She is grandstanding. Her questions showed no personal understanding of the situations she was describing - she could barely read the text scripted for her by her staff. And her specific questions were asked in a way that they were clearly designed to elicit responses that could only be used against both Abrams and any administration he served or serves. (Granted, he could have offered better responses [we support democratically elected governments; we do not condone acts of genocide or other human rights violations by anyone, friend or foe], but it is no surprise he was hostile after her setup.)
ReplyDelete